Exam Prep
GMAT Focus EditionLiveExecutive AssessmentIn DevelopmentGRE General TestIn DevelopmentLSATIn DevelopmentMCATIn DevelopmentSATIn DevelopmentACTIn DevelopmentAll Exam Guides
Lists
MBA RankingsLiveUndergraduateComing SoonLaw SchoolsComing SoonMedical SchoolsComing Soon
Resources
The Study Room (Blog)Exam GuidesCompare PlansFAQTerms of UsePrivacy Policy
Community
All ForumsLiveGMAT PrepStudy LogsAdmissionsQuestion of the DaySite Feedback
Account
Sign InCreate Account

GMAT Scores for Top MBA Programs: 2026 Guide

David Okafor · August 21, 2026 · 6 min read

Top MBA programs publish GMAT Focus figures in a narrow band near the top of the scale. Stanford GSB reports an average GMAT Focus score of 689, Harvard Business School a median of 685, Wharton an average of 676, and MIT Sloan a median of 675 (each school's Class of 2027 profile, 2025; Wharton via Poets & Quants). On the Classic scale the same four schools report 738, 730, 735, and 720. None of these numbers is a cutoff. Here is how to read them and how to set your own target from them.

What GMAT scores do top MBA programs publish?

Four of the most selective US programs published the figures below for the class that entered in fall 2025. Watch the stat type column: Stanford GSB and Wharton report averages, while MIT Sloan and Harvard Business School report medians. An average and a median are different summaries, so never rank schools by mixing the two.

SchoolStat typeGMAT FocusGMAT ClassicPublished spreadSource and year
Stanford GSBAverage689738Focus range 615 to 785Stanford GSB Class of 2027 profile, 2025
MIT SloanMedian675720Focus middle 80% 645 to 735; Classic middle 80% 710 to 760MIT Sloan Class of 2027 profile, 2025
Harvard Business SchoolMedian685730Also reports median GRE 164 Quant and 164 VerbalHBS Class of 2027 profile, 2025
WhartonAverage676735Focus range approximately 620 to 725; Classic middle 80% 680 to 770Wharton Class of 2027 profile; Poets & Quants, 2025

One more feature of the HBS profile is instructive: 44% of the Class of 2027 submitted a GRE, 34% a GMAT Focus, and 28% a Classic GMAT, with some students submitting more than one test (HBS Class of 2027 profile, 2025). A published GMAT figure describes the part of the class that submitted a GMAT, not the whole class. How to read stat types, ranges, and editions across a full shortlist is the subject of our companion guide on how to read MBA class profiles.

Why is a published average not a cutoff?

Because enrolled classes spread widely around every headline figure. Stanford GSB pairs its 689 Focus average with a published range of 615 to 785, MIT Sloan pairs its 675 Focus median with a middle 80% of 645 to 735, and Wharton pairs its 676 Focus average with a range of approximately 620 to 725 (Class of 2027 profiles, 2025; Wharton via Poets & Quants). Students enrolled below the headline number at each of these schools.

The arithmetic of a median makes the same point. A median of 685 (HBS Class of 2027 profile, 2025) means about half of the school's GMAT Focus submitters scored 685 or below. Treat a published figure as the center of gravity of an enrolled class, not as a bar you must clear before an application is worth sending.

How should you think in percentiles?

Whenever two editions appear side by side, convert to percentiles before comparing. GMAC's official concordance tables put a Classic 700 and a Focus 655 at the same 90.5th percentile, with a Classic 710 near a Focus 665 and a Classic 740 near a Focus 695 (GMAC official score concordance tables); the exam's official pages on mba.com carry the details. A Focus number roughly 45 points below a Classic number can represent the same rarity of performance. Our guide to the GMAT scoring scale walks through the anchors one by one. The working rule: read Focus figures against Focus figures, Classic against Classic, and percentiles across editions.

How do you set a target score from published figures?

  1. Pull the official numbers. Use each school's own class profile page, such as MIT Sloan or Wharton, and note the stat type, the edition, and the spread behind every figure.
  2. Anchor on your most selective target. Set your working target at or slightly above that school's published average or median; on the Focus scale, the four figures above run from 675 to 689 (Class of 2027 profiles, 2025).
  3. Use the published spread as your floor. A score inside a school's middle 80%, like MIT Sloan's 645 to 735 Focus band (MIT Sloan Class of 2027 profile, 2025), keeps you in the conversation; a score below the bottom of the spread makes that school a reach on numbers alone.
  4. Set one number and stop adjusting. A target that moves every week is a symptom of anxiety, not strategy. Fix it, build the study plan, and revisit only after a full practice test.

Start From Nowhere's trainer includes a target-school feature that links its rankings pages to your score goal, so your practice tracks the schools you actually chose. For what counts as strong across the wider market, beyond these four schools, see our guide to a good GMAT score in 2026.

When is your score done?

Your score is done when it sits at or above the published average or median at your target schools, or comfortably inside their published spreads while the rest of your file is still unwritten. Past that point, extra points buy less than the same hours spent on essays, recommenders, and your resume. Committees read whole files, and a polished file with a score at the median is a stronger position than a rushed file with a score above it. Our MBA application timeline shows how quickly essay season arrives, and our MBA resume guide covers the piece applicants most often underinvest in.

When does a retake make sense?

Retake when three things line up: your score sits below the published spread at most of your targets, your practice results say the official sitting undersold you, and the calendar leaves room to prepare properly before deadlines. If only the first is true, consider adjusting the school list instead of the score. Our GMAT retake strategy guide walks through the decision step by step.

The published numbers are a map, not a wall. Set a target from the official figures, reach the band your schools report, and then move your energy to the parts of the application that only you can write.

Put this into practice
Run a free adaptive round. No account needed; the trainer finds your weak skills in one session.
Start a free round

Frequently asked questions

What GMAT score do you need for a top MBA program?
There is no required score. Four of the most selective US programs publish GMAT Focus figures from 675 to 689: Stanford GSB an average of 689, HBS a median of 685, Wharton an average of 676, and MIT Sloan a median of 675 (Class of 2027 profiles, 2025; Wharton via Poets & Quants). Scoring at or above your target school's published figure removes the test as a question mark.
Do top MBA programs have a GMAT cutoff?
No. Published spreads show enrolled students well below every headline figure. Stanford GSB reports a Focus range of 615 to 785 around its 689 average, and MIT Sloan reports a Focus middle 80% of 645 to 735 around its 675 median (Class of 2027 profiles, 2025).
Is a 675 GMAT Focus score good enough for a top MBA program?
It matches MIT Sloan's published median (MIT Sloan Class of 2027 profile, 2025) and falls inside the published Focus spreads at Stanford GSB and Wharton (Class of 2027 profiles, 2025; Wharton via Poets & Quants). At that level the rest of the application, not the score, usually decides the outcome.
Should I retake the GMAT if I am below a school's published average?
Not automatically. About half of the scores behind a median sit at or below it, and averages sit above many enrolled scores. Retake when you are below the published spread at most of your target schools, your practice results say you can do better, and deadlines leave time to prepare.

Keep reading

675 to 689
where top programs cluster
Exam Guides

What Is a Good GMAT Score in 2026? Charts by School

August 17, 2026 · 6 min
738 vs 730
average is not median
Admissions

How to Read an MBA Class Profile: Averages vs Medians

August 19, 2026 · 6 min